Thread:Fedora Kid/@comment-2091662-20141212112658/@comment-25194000-20141213050845

Not trying to bud in, but Natalie and Sandra are very deserving, because they did what Russell and Parvati COULD NOT DO. Convince the jury to give them the million dollars. The only objective to winning Survivor is by convincing the jury to vote you, and they are great players for doing that. Parvati might have had a shot if she didn't have such a horrible social game in HvV. Making flashy moves isn't the motive of Survivor, convincing the jury is. Sandra's strategy was "anyone but me" which worked very well both times even against her own allies in PI, and she formed very close bonds with the Heroes, while Russell and Parvati kept mocking them all the time with JT's letter.

And I don't see the problem with SJDS. It's a little slow and weak, but the worst? Nothing can top Redemption Island and Caramoan in that sense. Missy/Nat/Jon/Jeremy/Keith/Baylor/Jaclyn have all been fleshed out and even Dale got his own little storyline and the Drew boot was an amazing episode. Unlikable??? what??? We really don't have a villain this season because most people are getting along, so you can't always have the villain of the season. "Main players are overrated." Reed was incredibly fun to watch, and Natalie is arguably one of the best Survivor players because she builds social ties, executes plans and can befriend everyone even if she hates them. How are they wimps at all? Because some people don't like breaking incredibly strong ties they've made with people? And you are calling millions of people dumb because they are liking a season you don't like? Control your superiority complex...