User blog comment:Shinneth/Time to get Serious./@comment-2234888-20120525231224/@comment-901090-20120525233315

You're worried that an inactive user in a high position doesn't give a good example to others, but I can think of numerous other wiki-related problems that pose as an even greater issue that could lead users astray.

And really, is there any evidence at all that links my inactivity to anyone else's?

I've tried multiple times in the not-so distant past to help out, but as I said, I'm either being ignored (and it's not for lack of effort on my part to direct others to proposals I make and the like) or my edits get thoughtlessly undone because most don't take the time to see that many of my edits consist of more than just erasing material I see as unnecessary.

So you're concerned about my inactivity causing other users to become the same way. With all due respect, I think that's an extremely minor concern. The way things are being run are discouraging me from trying to be active again. Shouldn't the priority lie in how active users are running the wiki rather than picking out people who aren't being active?