Thread:BarBar/@comment-1734566-20150409013113/@comment-2091662-20150414164735

Izzynoah12 wrote:

BarBar wrote: To your opinion they suck, I think Coach and Russell usually make for better characters (mostly Coach, he's hilarious!) But when it comes to the game Coach and Russell strike me as bad players and Sophie and Natalie strike me as solid ones. I'll guess we'll just never have to talk about it and we'll just speak of the current season. L O L. Both Coach AND Russell are good players. In their first seasons, they both had alliances, eliminated people, and were overall hilarious characters. They absolutely sucked when it came to the social aspect of the game when it came to the FTC but they were still good players. Hilarious characters means absolute sh** in terms of gameplay. Coach was a walking joke in his first two seasons and Russell has terrible social game, the social game is the game and I can't believe you said "They sucked in the social aspect and in the FTC but they were still good players." That's like saying that a soccer player that doesn't know how to kick or defend his team is a good player.

Lill didn't lost because she didn't owned up to things she did, she lost because she was an hated outcast. Becky/Danielle/Twila lost to better people. Same goes for Dreamz and Cassandra... yeah most of these people just lost to better people. Only some of them lost because they didn't owned to things they did.

I heard about those Phillip stuff, lol.