Thread:Fedora Kid/@comment-27379466-20150611060722/@comment-1734566-20150612180835

Again, it doesn't matter jacksh** if Jaclyn didn't know about the idol. All she knows is that Natalie will play an idol on HER (Jaclyn), and wants to get rid of Baylor. So with Jaclyn safe, between Natalie and Baylor - IT DOESN'T MATTER IF SHE "DIDN'T KNOW" NATALIE WAS A THREAT. Do you really think, for ONE SECOND, Baylor seemed to be a bigger threat than Natalie? LOL, if so, then that proves that Jaclyn's even F***ING STUPIDER than we thought. Again, what's wrong the situation I just proposed? A 1-1 tie, forcing a revote with an immune Jaclyn, obviously Natalie goes. Bam. Jaclyn's stupid.

And the only other people from that God-awful Season 29 who should come back are Dale and Rocker. <3

And lol at Natalie being one of the best female winners, and Denise one of the worst. Again, Denise was kinda like Mike in that she and Malcolm had their backs against the wall the ENTIRE time, yet still managed to survive literally everything AND make occasional big moves with the majority alliance. Natalie literally didn't do jacksh** until the last couple episodes. And that Baylor idol play was stupid - it was saving the alliance's ONLY rival/outsider in favor of eliminating a loyal ally and total jury goat. It made zero sense. And I find it funny that BarBar hasn't ripped into your "the jury luvs big moves" logic, because according to Bar, "big moves" are stupid. Well, if Natalie's F5 idol play wasn't the poster child for a "flashy move," then IDK what is. I can think of, off the top of my head, some female winners who are better than Natalie A, based on what I've seen and heard:

Tina, Amber, Denise, Kim, Sandra, Parvati, Danni, and Jenna, namely. The only ones that Natalie A is decisively better than: Natalie W and Sophie, who did LITERALLY jacksh**, while Natalie A at least did SOME stuff. And Vecepia, whom I've heard is a mediocre winner.