Thread:Fedora Kid/@comment-2091662-20141218114510/@comment-1734566-20141230204413

So you really, honestly believe that winning is all that matters? If you don't win, you're automatically a terrible player? Well shoot, by that logic then, NO ONE should ever return for all-stars seasons except former winners then, right? Coach, Russell, Ozzy, Rupert, Cirie, Rob C...according to you, they all suck because they didn't win. Gotcha.

And you still fell right into the trap that I just said. You refuse to acknowledge the other cases that I argue were "robbed winners;" Coach in SP and Parvati in HvV. You even took the "Almost There" theory that I just laboriously explained and twisted right back to Russell. Man, you have a serious ha**-on for hating on Russell, don't you?

So with that, I'll turn to the person who's making better arguments AND is proven to be more open-minded; Mirnish, you made some pretty good points there. So what do you think about the "Almost There" theory? And the only things I disagree with; Natalie A is not likable IMO, she was loud, rude, and obnoxious - if she was brought back for HvV 2 (God I hope not), she'd definitely be more of a villain than a hero. And on the Fan Favorite Award; OK, those are a few bad instances, but for the most part, it still went to the all-around best strategic player - JT, Russell twice, Fabio, Boston Rob, Ozzy, Kim, Lisa, Malcolm, etc., etc. So for the most part, it is a pretty solid gauge of who was the best strategic player.