User blog comment:TDA15/A Topic That Should Probably Be Addressed/@comment-1416490-20130831204230

I completely agree with this blog. From what I've read here and from what I've been seeing, it seems that other sites are not really giving us credit. I mean we work our butts off trying to make sure that this wiki is as accurate as humanly possible. We're really doing the best we can. Yet, other sites are scrutinizing us for it and I'm actually quite tired of it. Especially with the "But Scott was confirmed YEARS ago and they just now added it to their dumb site!" Ok, that was actually really immature of them to say in my opinion. It's also pretty rude too if you look at it. Like what Ryan said below, we waited until Scott and Sam were 100% confirmed before adding them.

Yes, I get that we're gonna have to deal with all of these issues, but have you ever thought that maybe these sites aren't really giving us enough credit? I mean come on! I know for a fact that there are a ton of canon sites out there that are nothing but predictions. There are sites out there that probably have so much pointless crap as well. And we're the ones getting scrutinized? The least thing they can do is give us just a little credit for once.

Starting fights and calling our wiki dumb is defiantly not the way to solve things.