Thread:BarBar/@comment-1734566-20150507222158/@comment-27004474-20150513043927

Fedora Kid wrote: This is further proof, Dianted, that A) You clearly jump into the middle of arguments and come out swinging even though you have no idea what's going on, since you would have to read ALL of the comments and see it from the BEGINNING in order to do that, and 2) You literally have your definitions so backward that up is down, black is white, and night is day in your book. IDK who's worse: Panda with his obvious trolling, or you with your hilariously false arguments and out-of-context ravings. A) I got two things from you from this statement. 1: You're saying my opinion's completely invalid because I don't know every single little detail about what happened pre- my reading. 2: This entire thread has been about Shirin and Will, according to you. Hilarious.

"2"/B) That was so cliché; I can literally say the same about you; and my arguments are obviously not "hilarious" or "false" if you continue to counter them. Funny how this works, huh? (Not out-of-context, either, considering the subject was on Shirin when I entered... seriously, dude, Google helps.)

'''Also, usually when doing a list, you don't jump from a letter to a number. (I never knew 2 was in the alphabet.)'''