Thread:Joshua.foote.14/@comment-5231983-20170120043010/@comment-1376932-20170130012133

I'm going to use this revision as an example of what you should be doing. This edit is productive as the original sentence was vague. This isn't something that would typically get reverted because what you've done with the sentence is constructive.

However, this isn't necessary; it just makes the trivia point longer and gives us information we didn't really ask for. In this revision, you've given the reader information about Chris that, again, isn't relevant - we're talking about Owen here so while what you added isn't necessarily wrong, it's not important either. Here, you've just added the word "ironically" as a conjunctive adverb. That doesn't improve the quality of the wiki in any way.

I can see that you're attempting to make more constructive edits which is great, so that's why I'm here: to give you advice on how to do that. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask me or another staff member.