Thread:Stryzzar/@comment-1037137-20150313055759/@comment-24152851-20150505121857

Yeah, like ages ago she said something along the lines of "yes, TDAS wasn't our best work". Even younger fans are seeing how terrible it is. Only younger fans who like Zoke are still able to enjoy it. Ah, good she did respond. Well I guess that's wrapped up for now.

Either of those countries declaring war any time soon seems really far-fetched. The world has got a far bigger issue with ISIS at the moment, which should be where there attention is focused on.

Despite his efforts to make it seem otherwise, those will always be the things his presidential reign will be remembered for. Yeah, I'm sure Bush did nothing to help prevent the recession, but he wasn't the root cause itself. Oh yes, the over encouraging of buying mortgages, it's starting to come back to me now. Wow, you guys had it much worse off than we did. Okay I see now, Bush not being able to think more than 5 minutes in front of himself was largely a part of this as well.

Bush always did seem like the one who would take his time with his decisions, and not in a good way. I remember during 9/11 he was reading to some kids at the time, and after he was told the news he just kept reading, so once again Cheney was the decision maker. But back to New Orleans, yeah just sounds like a lot of irresponsibility on his part.

Oh right, I'm an idiot. Clinton had served his two-terms. Sorry, I have to review my American political history. That makes a lot more sense how Bush managed to get up there. That's sort of what happened with Gillard and Abbott in 2010, only on a country-wide scale. I don't know if Al Gore could've delivered the same standard as Clinton, but it's unlikely he could be worse than Bush. Yeah I've seen some of his climate change campaigns, doing quite an impressive job at that too I might add.

Yep, similar event but for different reasons. For Putin it was because he was too popular and the "real leader", while with Cheney it was because the other guy was just incompetent. Mmmhmm, I remember that, I'm not sure there even would've been an Iraq invasion if Cheney wasn't there. Though Bush Snr. was wise enough not to go the full way and stopped at the right time, while Bush Jnr. just went all out and left the country in ruins. I still can't get over how stupid that WMD bullcrap was. If I recall correctly it started from some paper a college student wrote being used as "evidence".

Amazing how that one man could leave such an impact. He's rightfully one of the most influential Presidents in American history, just behind the four carved on Mt. Rushmore. Leaders like him who genuinely care for the country's welfare and pour in so much effort are so rare, and much needed. At least his most likely immediate successor has high hopes as well. Hillary seems very promising, and will probably deliver quality close to Obama.

He's already been called out by the opposition as that being a delusional fantasy.

Like many leaders, he's only concerned with the immediate "what can I do to secure as many voters" approach and taking every shortcut and cheap trick he can muster. Only in Abbott's case, he can't even deliver satisfaction from the "living in the moment" voters who don't think ahead. It's going to be a long time for Australia's political savior to arrive, and we're just going to have to wait it out. For the time being it's back to the "lesser of two evils" thing. But I'm not contempt with either. Thing with a lot of Australian voters is a lot of them are too easily swayed by some appeal. I'm one of the more stabler ones and tend to stick to the side that fits my values more, but not this time. We need something fresh to act as a possible way out.

I answered that above in paragraph 1. Good to hear it.