Thread:Fedora Kid/@comment-2091662-20141218114510/@comment-2091662-20141231115648

About the first comment:

Russell sucks because he brought people to the end that he COULD NOT beat, not in a million years. Read post-show interviews, they all say he's creepy. And he's not some super-fan, he literally never watched the show. Boston Rob didn't voted out people that he could beat, again, he Rob could only won against Phillip/Natalie T., which is exactly why he took them! (Even if it took him four times to learn who to bring to the end lol). Kim could have won against anybody, really, it didn't matter who she brought to the end. BTW, Russell wouldn't have beaten Laura M... wtf? (She wasn't in his alliance anyways). Point is, he voted out the only two people (Jaison and Shambo) that he could have beaten, and for that, he deserved to lose. Just look at the jury scoers, 7-2, and 6-0.

About the second comment, his social game DOES suck, like... for example, if you watch HvV Ponderossa videos, they are all like "I hate Russell. He's sucks. He's crazy. He prummessed me a finale three." He's very ignorant, too. Like, Monica went up to him and said "Be nice to me before you put me on the jury. You need to put people that will vot for you." and he's like "I don't think so." lol

Don't compare Tony to Russell, I mean... Tony is a blowout winner (8-1!), and Russell is two time blowout loser! TBH, Tony had Trish has his damage-controll dog, because she liked him that much, nobody really cared about protecting Russell, cause they all knew they would beat him. Those cheerleaders means nothing, Spencer and Erik might have gotten them like 1 vote? But if you seriously think that like 3 minutes-crazy-speech changed people's minds after a FTC that went for hours (sadly they cut alot from the FTC) you're weird. All the people you mentioned -- either brought goats (Rob), or had above-decent social game (Tony, Tyson). How is that that the "Greatest player ever" makes everybody hates his guts? ;P