User blog comment:Freehugs41/Dear Total Drama Wiki,/@comment-1756703-20110327064356/@comment-1204060-20110327161242

Jam: This isn't slander. Due to the following reasons:
 * Slander is spoken
 * It is when what the person is saying is directly insulting and not true. Everything insulting in this blog is 100% true, no matter how much you argue me on it.

And, can't you wait for them to defend themselves? You're jumping into the heat of the moment everytime with no willingness to wait is half of what I'm upset about.

If it's not true, how come I'm the one with proof? I can show anyone the page where you made your desicion, on the "family guy set up wiki" which implicates heavily a secretive notion due to it not being on this wiki itself. And, not contacting all of the council members about a council meeting is unfair to those who clearly worked hard to be on the council, and that also implies a high level of dishonesty and, also, haste. What's the harm in waiting? Obviously, I was inactive, so it's not like I was doing anything to harm the wiki any time soon. Could you not have just waited for the rest of the members and had the discussion, leaving it only in the chatroom. And, for that matter, could you not have attempted to contact me? You may think that, as I was the person being demoted, I no longer matter to the council. I believe that is a poor assumption for a leader to make. Unless you were entirely trying to force me out of the wiki, which is a plausible motive due to the fact that this was so secretive and I was not told about it. then I should still matter to the wiki, because all users matter.

So, I can only gather from your statement that you are entitled to give other staff members your exact same opinion, because they are not here to read what you claim is false, when I'm the one who has, not only proof of the page, but also screenshots of heavy bias among staff members (implicating this situation could easily take place, which it did), and more knowledge of this wiki than you could ever hope to have. Also, you're accusing me of assuming that people would just repeat your responses because you said so, which you have no grouds to accuse whatsoever, and I find it to not only be insulting, but libel (which is the written form of slander, so it is correct) because you have no way to prove that. Can you prove that you had grounds to say something like that?

You're trying to say this is all false without having anything to prove against it, other than that people being demoted are irrelavent to their demotions and ensuring the wiki that the council isn't corrupt. And, I have to say, if you want to keep calling my facts delusisions, go right ahead. But anyone who fully understands the situations knows who isn't trying to hide their power-hungry motives with smoke and mirrors in this situation.

Mygeto: No. I created the council to have discussions within the admins and rollbacks, something we did not have at the time it was created.

CD-TDA: I'm protesting it because Jam shouldn't be trying to make a point by tacking on all other staff members to her opinions. Jam has no right to do that, and they should be allowed to speak for themselves with no one else forcing their opinions on them