Thread:Stryzzar/@comment-1037137-20150201074641/@comment-24152851-20150219102614

Conflicting writing has happened in every season, even in TDI. Where there was that issue of Gwen being mad at Trent in one episode, they're back together in the next, and don't even talk to each other in the one afterwards. But at least the plot was consistent even if it was out of order. This is something else altogether, and no TV shows should have any excuse to do something like this. Though aside from SMS, the other episodes weren't really bad because of bias, they were just bad because no one cared about the quality anymore. Booty-ful (even the name is stupid), was just all over the place and had "get it over and done with" painted all over it. And we all know why Final Wretchening was so terrible, someone is uneducated about he difference between what's funny and what's insulting.

Sure, but best to either address those questions a while from each other, or to address them in the same thread with the trinity together. With SMS however, I can sort of see the argument some people on the Wiki Wars blog are making. "If you took Courtney out it was an okay-ish episode". I used to think that way myself. But what can't be ignored was the level of bias that should not be present in the responsibilities as a writer. The only reason why I place B&BF lower is because, from start-to-finish there wasn't a single thing in that episode that didn't make me want to bash my head. Gwen hits her character's rock-bottom, no plot, stupid challenge, Mal is even worse than usual, and did they just search up every freaking poop joke on the internet in the making of that episode?

We'll finalise on how we'll address it later on. Just give me a heads up when you're thinking of doing it.