Thread:Stryzzar/@comment-1037137-20150313055759/@comment-1037137-20150502085222

We'll see if that's so mate, we'll see if that's so. Still a lot to prove with this spinoff and it could be ages before we see if any lessons were taken from the TDAS fiasco. Personally I'm not too optimistic. RR could just as easily be used as a cover or as "compensation" for TD as it barrels down the same path it has been. We'll see if I'm wrong to say that, but it's so easy to come to our own conclusions on how they have or intend to operate. In the meantime, RR is going to need to get some more updates going if it's to have anybody watching when it's time to get the ball rolling. The backgrounds are definitely something, a new team reveal would hold over the masses for a while more as that's what they want. Though time is of the essence, and it can be best used double and then triple checking every single thing they put in and making sure none of it falls in line with what made such a horrendous season the embarrassing debacle it is. We'll see eventually if quality control has been present this time.

Yeah, I agree. Nothing lengthy is necessary. Thanks for that, that's an inquiry I intend to make sure is seen. Sure would be nice to see that this kind of reckless writing doesn't resurface if it can be helped.

62%? That's far worse. And a misogynist and sexist even? Sounds like Australia got saddled with a real piece of work here, and that's hardly a compliment. A man with all his priorites in the wrong place, not unlike Bush. Though that was a man who simply didn't possess the intelligence or the foresight to understand the ramifications of his decisions or of leaving so much policymaking to his even more misguided allies. Your friend Abbott there perhaps leans more towards a Dick Cheney type. All I know about Abbott comes from all you've just told me this week, and it sounds like he's a man who knows what he's doing, he just doesn't care who suffers for it. That could cost him bigtime. Sounds like it already is. The Republicans, they lost in 2012 because they had burned so many bridges in the months leading up to the election. Whether it was with women, with millenials, with the Latin American population, African Americans, they in defending misguided/outdated beliefs core to their party or just not having any realistic or practical alternatives to offer to the stage just could not win over the people, and so Obama won handily. In both his elections, there was absolutely no dispute that he was victor. He's a divisive President, but I think that's the Republican Party doing everything in their power to feed that controversy, the man himself is so easy to get along with and not the walking joke Bush often was. And I still do sense that he cares for the people. Which is more than I can say for this Tony Abbott guy, if he's as bad as you're saying he is and if his approval ratings are any evidence of it, then let his attempts at reelection be met with resounding defeat. Go out like Franklin Pierce, who was flat out refused a shot at reelection due to his damaging ineptitude as a president.

Something tells me Abbott will be met with potential challengers, if he continues on the downward slope he's sent himself sliding on. In the U.S., impeachment works similar to that. How much did those last two Labor PMs deserve their ultimate removals? Abbott sounds like the guy you should be eager to see impeached, and whatever happens I hope he's removed from everyone's hair soon. Were those othe two guys the spectacular failures Abbott's shaping up to be?