Thread:TDWTisAWESOME/@comment-1734566-20151210220222/@comment-1734566-20151212175147

No, no, we appreciate your input, as always. You made some excellent points and clarified some more things I haven't heard, lol.

What exactly did Probst say? Just that something will happen that has never happened before? Because yeah, that always does beg the question of what that could be - and especially what COULD be done if all votes were cancelled out, lol.

And hm...a Final 4 instead of a Final 3? Well, it would still leave us with a 9-person jury...I mean, that'd seem REALLY strange, to say the least, but would TOTALLY change things up for sure. I could especially see the winner being the recipient of a mere plurality of votes, rather than a majority. Like a 4-3-1-1 or something, lol. That'd be cool.

And yeah, I made that point a long time back upon this boot lists' reveal: It seems to me that the actual order of the finalists would be SIGNIFICANTLY harder to achieve than just the regular old boot list. I mean, shoot; any of the eliminated contestants, or even a staff member at Ponderosa, or something, could easily leak the boot order and the finalists themselves. But to have the actual ORDER of the finalists? That's the utmost confidential information that, like, only Probst and the producers themselves have access to. The only other thing I can think of is that all of the jurors mingled and discussed who they voted for (which I don't think they're allowed to do, lol), and then someone from the jury leaked THAT information...which is still not guaranteed correct. So that, in a nutshell, is why I always had SOME doubts about the authenticity of the ranking of the three finalists, especially after the regular boot list itself has been proven wrong TWICE. Perhaps the person who originally posted it just gave their personal opinion? Their prediction? The only other logical order I can see is alphabetical by first name (J, then S, then T...)? Meh.

But yeah - I think this should still be a REALLY exciting finale. At the end of the day, will it be just the WORST thing ever if Jeremy actually does beat Spencer? Not really. I mean, it certainly wouldn't be a case of a TOTALLY undeserving winner robbing the most deserving, like a Natalie White or Sophie. Jeremy is still very worthy in his own right, albeit with some obvious blunders, and an overall lack of activity lately in comparison to his two main rivals. Again, I'd rather see Spencer lose to Kelley than to Jeremy. But, at the VERY least, if Jeremy does beat Spencer, I want it to at least be close (6-4-0 or 5-4-1, like you said), because DANGIT, I am SO tired of landslide votes! The last time we saw a close vote was NICARAGUA, 10 seasons ago! :P