Thread:Stryzzar/@comment-1037137-20150313055759/@comment-24152851-20150501084756

Hopefully that actually amounts to something, and the delay isn't merely caused by other reasons. Though chances are they don't want to risk a repeat of what they got with TDAS and are treading more carefully now. Well, the backgrounds itself aren't immensely exciting to me, but the release of material and the sign that they still care about the eager awaiting fans is a bit of consolation.

Alright, I'll be waiting.

Well ironic thing is, a few prime minsters back was John Howard who was also of Tony Abbott's political party (Liberal Party). John Howard who was infamous for many thing, one of which was blindly falling George W. Bush into everything (including the War on Iraq). Among all of John Howard's replacements in his own party, many have tried going in different directions, but Abbott was always one of Howard's most loyal supporters and followed in his path once he came into power (in fact Howard had originally wanted Abbott as his replacement when he considered resigning). Anyway, there are some areas I'm aware of he's tossing the money. A few years back (when he first came into power), he had used a lot of the money to buy the most advance military aircraft which we don't even need, because he's worried China will invade Australia. Also, the last major news on funding that I can remember, he had put a lot of money into some obscure science research, and the science industry was one of the few who had benefited. But it's just unforgivable considering the other areas he has blown funding on. Out last prime minister (Julia Gillard) had started cutting funding from universities/colleges and had already come under criticism from Abbott, but when it was his turn not only did he not get rid of that but went even further. He's also raised the pension age to 70, forcing our seniors to work even longer. That's breaking the surface of why he's becoming the most despised prime minister in a very long time.