User blog comment:Christlover357/Why I Love Ella/@comment-4516085-20141224064111/@comment-25285054-20141226003932

Well, true, but in this case, there wasn't really any evidence against B, just an open-claim., at least about the whole "he hates nature" thing. As far as the whole Beetle whipserer thing, that was not really something she knew for sure about Scott, just something she briefly thought about him with...not really anything pertaining to whether it's true or not. Trusting him soley based on that isn't really what I would consider smart.

It may have seemed like B had tried to sabotage the challenge, and voting him off just because of that would be one thing...but with Scott, wouldn't it seem pretty supsicious when the same person who told you that this particular guy sabotaged the challenge, also says that he hates nature? How would Scott even have had the latter information in the first place, anyway?

Also considering that she had already creeped out practically everyone, eliminating her only friend doesn't really seem like a good idea, since that way people would probably vote her off for being...creepy later anyway.

So really, she might not be dumb...but I'd say she has above average intelligence at best, since she doesn't really seem to think ahead at all, and mostly she seems to just take in the information given to her with little to know second thought.