User blog comment:Epic~00/In Defense of: Duncan/@comment-1037137-20150327003954/@comment-1037137-20150327210530

I don't buy that at all. I won't makes excuses for any of that debacle. Sorry, but I firmly disagree with that assessment. That was deliberate flanderization as a byproduct of something that was deliberately controversial and took liberty with the characters to justify something that was beyond forced. And on that note, there is no truth to the idea that Gwuncan was in any way developed realistically or naturally in the little real exposure and shared screentime they had before it was dropped like a bombshell.

"Rerailment", THAT was rerailment? No. It was not. Not going to dispute it.