User blog comment:Bigez620/"No One Eggspects The Spanish Opposition" - Review/@comment-4742462-20131016163303/@comment-1376932-20131017002136

I know it's all a matter of preference, but how wasn't Alejandro a good villain? Scott I can agree with, but only because his strategy was really flawed. The problem with Scott is that his strategy depended on luck a lot. How was he so sure his teammates wouldn't vote him off eventually, or notice that he was throwing challenges? Even if they did give him the boot and he used the idol, there's only one idol; nothing guaranteed that he would survive the next elimination after that, or even the merge.

But you've gotta admit that kicking Dawn and Mike off the show was pretty smart. Framing Dawn and blackmailing Mike, how isn't that villainous? Unfortunately, the writers made him too comedic for me to take seriously, so when he was trying to be intimidating, it really... wasn't intimidating.

But Alejandro? He used tactics that Heather used and actually caused more eliminations than she did. Flirtation, betrayal, and lying are all things Heather has done in the past (maybe not doctoring an image which could have potentially blown up in his face later, but you get my point). I get how you can say he's not a good character, but a terrible excuse for a villain?

Are you sure your love for the characters these two booted isn't clouding your judgment?